home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- Priest and Chaplain
- The characters of the chaplain, in Albert CamusÆ The Outsider,
- and the priest, in Franz KafkaÆs The Trial, are quite similar, and are
- pivotal to the development of the novel. These characters serve
- essentialy to bring the question of God and religion to probe the
- existentialist aspects of it, in novels completely devoid of religious
- context.
- The main idea visible about these two characters is that they
- are both the last ones seen by the protagonists, Mearsault and K., both
- non-believers in the word of the lord. Whereas the chaplain in The
- Outsider tries to make Mearsault believe in the existence of god, the
- priest tries to warn and explain to K. what will happen to him.
- The reason the chaplain is the last one to see Mearsault is
- becasue itÆs his job to let the prisioners have a final shot at
- redemption before they are executed. The reason that K. meets with the
- priest is out of advice given to him by someone, and he is the last
- character that he shows K. interacting with (although it might be true
- that K. meets and interacts with other people after the meeting, but
- they are neither mentioned nor visible later on). The priest doesnÆt try
- and make K. confess or anything of the sort, he is mainly there to
- converse with the character, his religious position is almost put to no
- use.
- The existentialist view of religion is that humans have been
- alienated from god, from each other, and so forth. In the novel Crime
- and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, the christian idea of salvation
- through suffering is omnipresent throughout the novel. What is visible
- with The Trial and The Outsider is that they donÆt touch on the aspect
- of religion much throughout the story (The Outsider has bits and pieces
- of it appearing in his cross examinations but they are used more to mock
- than in an analitical sense). The presence of these two characters at
- the end of the novel serves to cover all the existentialist areas known
- to existemtialists (although it is doubtful whether the authors
- consciously attempted to make the characterÆs present because of any
- existentialist rules they had to follow).
- The characters are required to structure the novels, beside the
- obvious existentialist areas. The characters are there to let the
- protagonistÆs blow off some steam. In all the beaurocracy, confusion,
- and incompetence these two remain as the only ones that understand the
- predicament of the protaganists. They actually seem to understand what
- the protagonists are going through. The priest is more direct, yet
- symbolic, with K., telling him a story laden with symbolism and telling
- him what heÆs about to go through. The chaplain tries to take advantage
- of what he understands about Mearsault, and take control of his ideas in
- his final moments.